PDA

View Full Version : First jewelry??


fritchie
04-15-2004, 11:26 PM
The BBC (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3629559.stm) has just posted an archeological announcement about South African “pea-sized” mollusc shells drilled and apparently strung into necklaces or bracelets about 70,000 years ago. We had a similar post some months back about roughly 40,000 year old carvings of birds, animals, and possibly human-like figures in Germany.

Both of these discoveries say something about the early age at which humanity developed abstract thinking, and about the artistic nature of that early characteristic. South African sites, such as this “Blombos Cave on the southern tip of the continent” and east of Cape Town, long have been sources of highly developed early human fossils.

This area is far from the equator and has a climate not unlike that of Europe. Modern humans are thought to have left Africa for the rest of the world approximately 60,000 - 50,000 years ago, via the Arabian Peninsula. This South African area may or may not be unique as the place of development of modern humanity, but it is looking increasingly good.

Possibly even more interesting to sculptors is a block of incised, solid ochre of about the same age which was discovered at about the same location several years ago. Both pictures are posted.

jwebb
04-16-2004, 11:40 AM
Wonderful. Thank you, fritchie.

sculptor
04-16-2004, 01:22 PM
yes--enlightening--thanx

any word about who the artists were?
H.S.S. ? H.S.A.----sapiens sapiens? ----sapiens archaic?

rod

Araich
04-16-2004, 05:52 PM
Have we altered at all over these 70,000 years? Or just out collective knowledge, culture and society?
I mean, are we essentially any different now as an organism?

sculptor
04-16-2004, 06:18 PM
Have we altered at all over these 70,000 years? Or just out collective knowledge, culture and society?
I mean, are we essentially any different now as an organism?


I think not.

fritchie
04-16-2004, 09:38 PM
yes--enlightening--thanx

any word about who the artists were?
H.S.S. ? H.S.A.----sapiens sapiens? ----sapiens archaic?

rod

I’m sure they were Homo sapiens sapiens, modern man. The article said nothing about fossils, but the time period of about 60,000 years ago (plus or minus ??? years) is considered about that for the birth of true, contemporary man.

This also gives me the opportunity of acknowledging the research team and university, something I should have done yesterday. Christopher Henshilwood of the University of Bergen, Norway, was the lead researcher.

rderr.com
04-16-2004, 10:48 PM
Two phrases I've quoted from the article I think seminal to all creative persons.

Art is always provocative. All else, decorative.

Ardor