![]() |
#151
|
||||
|
||||
Re: David
During it all, the narrative that had set things in motion eventually gets thinned-out and discarded; and rightfully so. Because whims occur and physical limitations arise that were never part of the "plan". I know that the whole thing is going well when the object quits on the story.
The "robot" thing is simply a very agreeable way to execute figuration out of metal junk. Of course it will get attached to me as a "style" but in the end I dont find it all that much different than the abstractions. Someone will buy him eventually...and that bugs me a little right now...but it wont bother me down the road when plenty of other fresh stuff has accumulated around the yard, the tonnage can become alarming; but for now, I stationed him near my concrete workpad. We'll discuss philosophy while I labor and then I'll let him whirlygig himself over to the beer store so as not to become lazy. |
#152
|
|||
|
|||
Re: David
Do you refer to your sketches as you work, or after complete? Just curious.
__________________
Taking my own advice |
#153
|
||||
|
||||
Re: David
Quote:
I suppose the idea-development is work...though significantly more passive. So sketches would be there along with looking at pictures, reading some words and allocating/separating-out material. But often things I call sketches might be gesture studies on paper or even in steel. its the way you search for the "right" thing. Most of the time the sketches serve to show me all the wrong things. When its go-time all bets are off and all those sketches get left in the dust. I probably only did them to validate the time it takes to work up the nerve to tackle the real thing. So yes, sketches are work, and might even be a fleeting sample of HARD work, but they are not THE work. And they can be peddled also...cause every little bit counts back there in the ant colony. |
#154
|
||||
|
||||
Re: David
Quote:
I have the greatest admiration for work which is beyond my abilities and sensibilities, and this fits both parameters. So glorious to see scraps turn to form with real purpose. |
#155
|
||||
|
||||
Re: David
Have to agree with WillPaq here.
Lithe, indeed. What first strikes me is the entirely relaxed pose. Belabored/recoiled/outward exhalation. I wanted to stew on the images for a bit....Nice going, Matt. Last edited by obseq : 05-27-2009 at 09:26 AM. |
#156
|
||||
|
||||
Re: David
When you really break it all down, We sculptors compose line, mass and contour to achieve our visual goals. Sometimes we say or wish or think that it (the object) has another more applicable purpose, but it doesnt. The thing must simply get THERE to subjectively achieve our unique aesthetic desires.
Sometimes Mass leads the way as in the case of the electromagnetic "presence" of the monolith...sometimes line slices and dices the emptyness...and sometimes contour violently or gently displaces or wedges its way into our consideration. All or any of these formalities can lead us through our travails. In figuration all this MUST add up to the sensitivity of "gesture". Mannequinned or tin-manned or even "robotic" achievings are undesirable. Therefore it is of paramount importance for we who deal with the subject of the human figure to address the subtleties of The stance. A rendered figure will always fail if this has not been sufficiently handled.. Even the fire and tornado of process cannot overcome a "stiffened" piece of figuration. So my challenge there-in is always to at least get THAT satisfied. This brand of fulfilling is probably what keeps me coming back out from abstractland... Last edited by evaldart : 05-27-2009 at 03:15 PM. |
#157
|
||||
|
||||
Re: David
Quote:
Bravo, As well said as is done the Giant Killer. The complete gesture of the left hand, forefnger and thumb are as beautiful as the gestures of Mike's David and Pete's Eustache de St Pierre. RD |
#158
|
|||
|
|||
Re: David
Quote:
All i meant was 'do you look at your sketches as you weld' which you answered, and the rest is gravy on the taters. ![]()
__________________
Taking my own advice |
#159
|
|||
|
|||
Re: David
From some angles some body parts look humorous. Was that your intent?
|
#160
|
||||
|
||||
Re: David
What you are seeing is part of the complete evaldart package, which almost always includes a healthy dose of humor along with the wallop.
|
#161
|
|||
|
|||
Re: David
whats that fancy word for balancing most of the weight on one leg in figure sculpture, I see this trick used in alot…
What makes this sculpture work is the recoil pull starter rope ![]() |
#162
|
||||
|
||||
Re: David
Quote:
|
#163
|
||||
|
||||
Re: David
humor, intensity, foreboding, shock, awe, amusement and unrelenting are only a few of the things that try to get stuffed into a work. Varying degrees of each, of course, depending upon my mood at the moment
![]() |
#164
|
|||
|
|||
Re: David
Glenn and Joe, I've been here for a while
![]() I was curious of Evald's answer. It looks to me it started out serious at the bottom part and gesture, and it turned into humorous halfway up. From David he transformed into Dave. I guess what I'm saying is I would like this piece a lot if it wasn't for the title. But that's my problem, right Evald? |
#165
|
||||
|
||||
Re: David
I changed the title officially to "Giant Killer" (because it doesnt matter to me). It sounds more aggressive and threatening to go-along with the little propellor.
So it didnt end up being a "David" after all. Its all in the departing. |
#166
|
||||
|
||||
Re: David
Quote:
So. Dave is a great name. Last edited by jOe~ : 05-27-2009 at 01:37 PM. Reason: additional verbiage |
#167
|
|||
|
|||
Re: David
I agree with Joe. The new title is good, people will inevitably associate it with David-- as opposed to comparing it to David. And that is the importance of the title right there.
|
#168
|
||||
|
||||
Re: David
Quote:
only those who 'know' figuration and have had a long term relationship with their medium can make it look so easy. great piece Evaldart, just special. |
#169
|
||||
|
||||
Re: David
Quote:
__________________ |
#170
|
||||
|
||||
Re: David
Already found some on Flickr. Better than my own of course.
|
#171
|
|||
|
|||
Re: David
great pics. the second one makes giant killer look tiny though. Odd, like how toys seemed larger when you were playing with them.
__________________
Taking my own advice |
#172
|
||||
|
||||
Re: David
In the second photo I'm imagining all of those peewee sculptures in the background running for cover. The one to the immediate right of the Giant Killer looks like it is frozen in shock from the sight of G.K.
|
#173
|
||||
|
||||
Re: David
Quote:
Right,.. I have to admit I didn't think he could pull it off and not because of the skills, but rather the context. David and Goliath remain timeless I guess as far as themes and ideas go so I shouldn't have been so quick to dismiss them as being implausable today. It reminds me of Mountshang's question about religeous works and whatnot on some other distant thread. He does have a rather studly air about him that make all of the others seem like tomato plant supports and various garden crafts and wind chimes in comparison. The next big one is only a fixed amount of time away. Hard work in the right hands=great sculpture. ![]() |
#174
|
||||
|
||||
Re: David
Last edited by evaldart : 06-02-2009 at 09:21 PM. |
#175
|
||||
|
||||
Re: David
"David" recently installed at the Norman Rockwell Museum as a participant in their outdoor exhibit "Robot Nation". Won best in show. He's out doing his thing.
|
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|